It’s a widely known fact that many governments (particularly in the West) officially deny any knowledge of the existence of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe. And flat-out deny that we have been visited by extraterrestrials in recent times. It is also known that governments have been exposed lying about their official stance on UFOs and incidents that have happened before. These range from the US government constantly changing their explanations for things and leaked documents (especially in the UK) that confirm that the government has a keen interest in UFOlogy and the extraterrestrial phenomenon. An interest to the degree where they have specialist units to go out and silence witnesses from exposing the truth and revealing details about what they had seen. And a quote from Margaret Thatcher on UFOs. “…you can’t tell the people.”
But a recent discovery of mine is that the Russian government (even the old Soviet government) were a bit more open about it to their people. There are news reports circling today that the Russian government is warning America’s dictator and illegal President, Barack Hussein Obama (previously known as Barry Soetoro) that if his Administration don’t reveal to the people their knowledge of UFO’s and confirm extraterrestrials exist soon, then the Russians will.
This is of no surprise to me, and in fact the Russians have a bit of history making public UFO and extraterrestrial incidents that have happened in Russia. One such incident is the Voronezh case, where a UFO landed in broad daylight in the middle of a busy park. Stranger still, the UFO opened a ‘hatch’ and 2 creatures appeared. One had 3 eyes and was humanoid and the other was supposed to be robotic. You’re probably saying, “Yea, right.” or, “Someone was smoking pot when they thought of this”. Wrong. For this incident was witnessed by several people.
The Soviet’s press agency, Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union (TASS), released these documents in their papers. The incident was then known to most people in the Soviet Union as a result. In the meantime the West were ignorant to the incident until a few years later (I think) when it was published in the media in the US and UK – only to be ridiculed by the press.
Some of you may be thinking that this is nonsense and that the Soviet Government at the time was a strong dictatorship and would not release such information to the people. Wrong again. TASS released information on this UFO incident and other UFO papers and documents because it was free to do so under President Gorbachev’s “glasnost“, which was his new policy of transparency and openness regarding the activities of government institutions, and a desire to provide freedom of information (some freedom of it anyways).
And in the report it states that this strange craft that glowed pink landed in the open in view of many witnesses. Aliens were seen and used technology far beyond our understanding and knowledge – even upon a human in full sight of the people. The incident left kids and adults terrified. The incident was investigated and researchers questioned everyone that had seen this happen. There were no contradictions at all between the accounts given to them by the different witnesses.
Below is a reproduction of the TASS report which was published in a newspaper on the 10th of October 1989.
Recent reports about the landing of aliens in the Russian city of Voronezh were confirmed in today’s issue of Sovetskaya Kultura.
The aliens landed on a war autumn evening on September 27, the paper said. Two boys and a girl from a local school, Vasya Surin, Zhenya Blinov and Yula Sholokhova, were in the city park. The place was crowded, with several dozen people waiting at a nearby bus stop. The boys were playing football.
At half past six, they saw a pink light shining in the sky and then spotted a ball of a deep-red colour about 10 meters in diameter. The ball circled the park for sometime above the earth and disappeared. It reappeared a few moments later and hovered above the park.
A crowd of onlookers rushed to the site, the paper said. They could clearly see a hatch opening in the lower part of the ball and a humanoid in the opening. The alien was about 3 meters high, had three eyes, was clad in silvery overalls and “boots” the colour of bronze and had a disk on its chest. The humanoid looked the place over. The hatch closed and the ball began to descend. “The object” then landed, according to the paper. The hatch opened again and two creatures came out, one apparently a robot.
The first one said something and a shining triangle, 30 by 50 centimeters in size, appeared on the ground and soon disappeared. The alien touched the robot’s body, and it started moving in a mechanical way.
One of the boys started screaming in fear. The alien looked at him and the boy fell silent, unable to move. The alien’s eyes were shining. The onlookers screamed. After a little while the ball and the creatures disappeared.
In about five minutes, the ball and the three-eyed humanoid could be seen again. The alien had what looked like a gun by his side – a tube about 50 centimeters long. He directed the thing at the 16-year-old boy and the latter disappeared. The alien went inside the ball, which immediately took off. At the same time the boy reappeared.
“It is hard to believe what happened,” the paper’s Voronezh correspondent, E. Yefremoc, writes. “It is harder yet to explain, but there is no doubt that something really happened.”
The UFO landing was witnessed by several people. Residents of Putilin Street in Voronezh said they repeatedly saw a UFO from September 23 to 29.
Militia officers and reporters interviewed the children and those who saw the anomaly. There are no contradictions in the descriptions of the ball or the aliens’ actions. All the children who saw the alien craft are still afraid. The local section that studies anomalies is investigating the incident, the paper said. The section includes scientists, physicists and biologists.
TASS-Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union.
Wow. Just wow. Government granted release of reports of what happened. Even allowing them to report the strange, almost paranormal, abilities of the visitors. Invisibility, making objects appear, causing a boy to freeze and fall silent and make him disappear by pointing a strange tube-like object at him.
If the Soviets (Now Russians) weren’t and aren’t afraid to release this information, why can’t the UK and US do it? What are they hiding? Even Belgium released documents on a military UFO encounter which the US and UK never acknowledged. Why?
On a different note, how do the aliens just vanish like that? Many (But not all) ET encounters I have heard or read about seem to have a few things in common. One of which being the silvery suits they wear. Are these metallic looking suits actually superior technology to cloak them in the visible light spectrum? Could the “Bronze” coloured boots be harnessing energy from the earth and their clothes from the air? A bit like Tesla’s work? What was the disk on his chest? How did the boy disappear? I wouldn’t say magic. Magic in my opinion is the name given to sciences and abilities that currently isn’t understood by us and our sciences. I don’t class it as “paranormal” per se. It’s normal if it works and exists in the universe. Just because we perceive things as normal and paranormal doesn’t mean that’s the case and shouldn’t be. We just simply don’t have an understanding of how to use the tools provided to us by the universe.
This encounter is food for thought though. And hopefully soon, someday, our governments will stop lying to us about what they know. Already, the Vatican has pretty much confirmed that ET’s exist. The Russians have done it. Now it’s our turn.
I have seen a few images and videos of strange anomalies around our sun before. This is something I haven’t really dug into and not something I would claim great knowledge on. But it doesn’t stop me wondering as to what these objects, if anything, could be.
Just today I was sent a video to look at. It’s very impressive and the poster of the video asserts that there is no foul play and these are not technical glitches. That’s all fine, but doing this is just as bad as being a skeptic where they would dismiss the space ship theory (not dismissing this possibility. Actually I am all for it). But we must look at all possibilities! Not choose just what we want to see.
The video in question can be found here:
Some objects look planetary/Asteroidy (not a word, but it works in this case). Others look like man-made structures. The video is interesting, though when we zoom in, the picture does go pixellated.
I cannot explain what exactly they are and I am aware of the theory of alien ships around the sun. Even saw a video of a solar flare hitting an object which caused it to reveal itself. It has been suggested that the object was cloaked and the flare temporarily revealed it as the charged matter was either deflected around the object or knocked the cloaking technology offline briefly.
The ship was on the right side of Mercury and as it was hit, the object glowed brilliantly and the shape was revealed. When this video caught the interest of people around the world, NASA and ‘leading astronomers’ were prompted to release a cover story. As is typical the explanations from different sources were contradicting each other and just didn’t match. From ‘broken pixels’ to ‘problems with the feed’, it is insulting that they expect people to believe these ridiculous explanations.
The video of which can be found here:
Now if that isn’t enough, there are also several pictures and videos of large star sized objects just on the other side of the Sun. People are making claims that this is Nibiru or the Nemesis star.
However, admittedly, most of the pictures I have seen and videos are indeed lens flare. They are dismissed to be lens flare from those who blindly accept explanations that dismiss ‘far-out’ ideas. With some of the videos I’ve seen as the camera is shaken about, the ‘object’ moves according to the characteristics of lens flare. In still images I have seen, the sun is on the left side of the picture and the ‘object’ is on the right. Pictures from the same people with the sun on the right side of the picture show the ‘object’ to be on the left. They then make the claim that this large heavenly body is moving!
But don’t get me wrong. I won’t flat-out dismiss this all as lens flare. I have seen some convincing and credible footage that cannot be possibly debunked by skeptics (though we know they will always find a way to continue lying to themselves). One of the best videos I have seen has coincidentally been removed from YouTube, though YouTube claim that the user removed it. But you should be well aware as I am that YouTube have a habit of removing these kind of videos and give the message that the user removed it.
The video in question had the natural camera shake and zoom characteristics you would expect from amature footage. As the camera pans up and zoom into the sun, you can see lens flares moving. However, when the camera focuses on the sun, you can see a large, blue, spherical object illuminated by the sun’s light on the left side of it. Even when the sun moves about, you can tell that the object beside the sun stays exactly where it is.
If it’s on the other side of the sun, then it isn’t 8 times bigger than Jupiter as some claim – It’s much bigger! This leads one to question what this object is. A large… abnormally large… planet that is as yet unknown to mainstream science? Is it the twin star of our system? Is it a massive alien spaceship? We won’t know for sure now. But I have a funny feeling all could be revealed in 2013. Don’t hold me to it. I’d just imagine if it is a planet orbiting round the sun, sometime in 2013 it should pass on our side of the sun before going back out, perhaps bringing with it 3 days or darkness due to its size (ancient prophecies relate here).
All in all, I encourage everyone to keep an eye on this phenomena. 2013 could prove to be an interesting year.
Yesterday was an amazing, beautiful day. Though cold and frosty, the sun was out and there was a large area of blue skies. So I took advantage of this to go for a run. The ground wasn’t too icy and there was a slight breeze.
As I was walking to my start point I could see far out towards the south/south-west, at high altitude, a lone plane casting a short but dense contrail (not chemtrail). Around 5 minutes later I could still see the plane and it didn’t look as if it had made much progress, which left me assuming the plane was higher that I first thought. Then, a few minutes later, the contrail started to fade. The silvery dot of the plane then slowly vanished. It had gone!
It managed to disappear as I noticed it was getting closer. I waited for a few moments then continued to walk, my eyes still keeping an eye on the sky and its last location, tracing a path I assumed it was following. I then proceeded to text a guy I know of what I saw. As I did this I listened intently for sound of a plane. Nothing.
My whole journey out there to run and there was no further sign of the craft nor noise. What was it? As some should know if they have read my posts, that I am a rational/spiritual guy and understand the importance of viewing things with a good balance of logic and intuition.
So when I got home I went on to http://www.flightradar24.com/ and went through the playback option from 2pm onwards. No planes were flying over my area. No where near my area, let alone in that direction. The skies seemed unusually quiet. And it was at that point I realised that I didn’t see any other plane out there, when normally the sky is quite busy with them.
I managed to capture a few pictures of the terrain and conditions. Obviously not the plane, but I took some pictures from the direction it was coming from.
In this picture, I’m looking in the general direction from where the plane was coming from
In this one, you can see how clear the sky is and conditions are frosty. But no sign of the plane.
This picture facing East. No sign of aircraft.
This one facing North. Brilliant skies but all is silent.
As is obvious, there are no signs of any aircraft in the skies. No contrails and I can honestly say there were no roars of engines or turbulence. What was it? I was stumped. Here are some theories I am open to:
- It was indeed a plane It could indeed be a plane and somehow trick of light prevented me from seeing it. But one must take into account as to why the plane vanished just after the contrail seemed to have been turned off. There is no way a contrail cannot reflect light in these conditions. It should be seen from all angles. The plane itself stayed on the same path and showed no signs of banking or turning. It should have still been reflecting the sun light. However, I am still open to the fact it could well be as it is – a plane from a fluke angle perspective.
- It’s a hologram This is a theory I am not too familiar with but was suggested by the guy I was texting about it. I am aware of the theory and in some of the instances the theory is used (e.g. Bluebeam, 11th September, military tests, etc). There was some frosty humidity in the sky, but not enough to affect or influence ones viewing of the object. Therefore, maybe not dense enough for holographic systems.
- Advanced military plane or test flight of military plane This could be a good explanation. We have been told in the news and informed by those in the alternative media that some military powers around the world have, and are using (trialing), cloaking devices on fabric, heavy armour and aircraft. These cloaking devices render a plane undetectable visually and on radar. Even the British military can cloak tanks by concealing their heat signature and even manipulate it in such a way to make it appear as something different when on thermal scopes. This could explain why I couldn’t see the plane after they turned off or adjusted in someway the plane to reduce or eliminate contrails. It could explain why it didn’t appear in the flight radar site. And interestingly enough, an RAF plane left England soon after I saw it according to the playback data and crossed Northern Ireland heading out over the Northern regions of the Atlantic.
So what was it? I can’t honestly say for sure. All I know is I can’t identify it and I have no explanation for its disappearance. Needless to say, I find it interesting and something I should look into and study further.